首页> 外文OA文献 >HESS Opinions On the use of laboratory experimentation: 'Hydrologists, bring out shovels and garden hoses and hit the dirt'
【2h】

HESS Opinions On the use of laboratory experimentation: 'Hydrologists, bring out shovels and garden hoses and hit the dirt'

机译:HEss意见关于实验室实验的使用:“水文学家,拿出铁锹和花园软管,打到泥土”

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

From an outsider's perspective, hydrology combines field work with modelling, but mostly ignores the potential for gaining understanding and conceiving new hypotheses from controlled laboratory experiments. Sivapalan (2009) pleaded for a question- and hypothesis-driven hydrology where data analysis and top-down modelling approaches lead to general explanations and understanding of general trends and patterns. We discuss why and how such understanding is gained very effectively from controlled experimentation in comparison to field work and modelling. We argue that many major issues in hydrology are open to experimental investigations. Though experiments may have scale problems, these are of similar gravity as the well-known problems of fieldwork and modelling and have not impeded spectacular progress through experimentation in other geosciences.
机译:从局外人的角度来看,水文学将野外工作与建模相结合,但大多忽略了从受控实验室实验中获得理解和设想新假设的潜力。 Sivapalan(2009)提出了一个以问题和假设为依据的水文学,其中数据分析和自上而下的建模方法导致了对一般趋势和模式的一般解释和理解。我们讨论了为什么以及如何通过与现场工作和建模相比较的受控实验非常有效地获得这种理解。我们认为水文学中的许多重大问题都可以进行实验研究。尽管实验可能存在规模问题,但这些问题与野外工作和建模的众所周知的问题具有相似的严重性,并且不会妨碍其他地球科学领域的实验取得令人瞩目的进展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号